Although at first glance, there appear far more important global issues on which to spend one’s thoughts, I can’t help but feel disgusted and disappointed in the recent spate of ads targeting women and sports. Violence against women selling men golf clubs, a blonde naked body selling online sports gambling to a mostly men audience.
Oh, its so much more than an ad. It’s more than the
eye-rolling trope of a young (white and sexualized) woman as a body prop in the
churning capitalist propaganda machine. Its more than nausea at sex being used
to sell arguably one of the worst vices (gambling) toward an aping (young,
male) audience, dismissing them as too young, toxic and dumb to know any better.
Its more too than the dismissal of all what women have fought for in the
athletic arena.
Yet, this is far more. These ads are aligned to a global
political authoritarian quasi-fascist movement that uses gender as a social
positioning tool: (re) asserting beauty as only valuable when exposed on a
white, young, blonde woman’s sexualized body, but also defining beauty as
purely esthetic and reproductive in nature, always in service of men. It is a predictable
Plato’s pendulum backlash to the recent global movements for body positivity,
inclusivity, women’s advocacy for taking up space, improving their pay, their
conditions in sports, and the struggle to shift not only who is considered beautiful
but also who gets to define beauty. We have fought to move ourselves away from
the reductionist male gaze (never just a gaze, always a violence in waiting),
toward women defining beauty for themselves and recognizing it in the diversity
of others. Beauty politics always mirrors a political social justice movement,
in this case one that sought to claim broader rights, step into and redefine
power, prove that equitable measures are necessary on the path toward intersectional
equality, and shine a radical overdue spotlight on men’s violence against women
in the household, the public square and the workplace. The shifts have been
small: structures are slow moving, and patriarchy is an adaptable beast. Yet, in
the confines of voting, young women (led by Black women) in the West are
increasingly voting for their rights and those of others, leading to the
largest political divide between men and women in voting history. Small wins.
These movements dealt a sharp blow to a predominantly white
patriarchal structure that had considered its supremacy all but assured. (But
who has actually suffered? Mainly women.)
Cue the backlash. In political landscapes and conflict, I
have watched governments and military use women’s bodies to justify all
measures of violence, equating the preservation of nation, borders and culture
to the preservation of family, motherhood and virginity, cementing the
righteous place of men at the heads of families, with women as the silent, smiling
wives and mothers. It is in Russia’s rhetoric for family values, castigating
Ukrainian inclusivity as ‘otherness’, it is in Israel’s hateful propaganda of
normative ‘goodness’ contrasting with the pained and darker features of
Palestinian women. I have witnessed revolutionary combatants celebrate (re:
use) women’s bodies at the forefront of their movements, only to deny them real
power, real decision-making roles in the future of countries. I have seen the physical
violence by men on women’s bodies to justify their own identities, whether in
war or in the bedroom, coupled with the violence of silencing women and denying
them basic rights and services based not only on their sex but their wider
physical selves: the colour of their skin, the shape of their eyes, the width
of their waist, the ability of their limbs.
So it is especially rage-baiting (lest we forget the
particular aim of these ads) to see sports – an arena that we wish was just for
us, just for the strength we possess, the courage and confidence we have, the
mindset we put to work, beyond the confines and policing of our shapes and
sizes – reduced to a naked blonde woman (with so little voice, and such a vapid
look) gazed upon by a million-fold men. (That she was in the room defining the
ad’s parameters is a reminder that women continue to be foot soldiers in a
white patriarchy (and often the first ones to get kicked out).) Women are born
with pain in our bodies: every month during our menstruation, in the health
issues affecting our wombs and our breasts, during pregnancy, birthing and
childcare, in perimenopause and menopause… and that is before the unending
physical and emotional ramifications of living in this world. For god’s sake, leave
us be, or simply, let us become.
So, it’s not just an ad. It’s yet another reminder that
women have never been the full owners of our bodies. Instead, we are used as brutal
landscapes of politics and violence – in service, always, of men.
I have loved seeing women in sports coming out to obliterate
this message. But we cannot speak about women’s bodies (and beauty) without
speaking about global rights, justice and equality. We cannot speak of women’s
bodies without speaking of the need to recognize race, disability and class
(among others, but top three, no?).
So, in order not to want to swim out in the ocean not to return, here’s to the women who resist. Fight, power through, are resilient stick to their truths, are warriors and beasts, let the rage fuel you. Here’s also to the women who are exhausted, soft, tentative, deeply hurt, needing of tenderness and care. And here’s to women trying, every single day. Making use of our bodies, our selves in all the ways that are true, that are free, to us, in the small ways women have always done, in this big beautiful and cruel world.
No comments:
Post a Comment